Site icon tax2tax.com

RESIDENTIAL STATUS OF A PARTNERSHIP FIRM

RESIDENTIAL STATUS OF A PARTNERSHIP FIRM

(As per Section 6(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961)


 1. Relevant Legal Provision

                Section 6(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 states:

“A Hindu undivided family, firm or other association of persons is said to be resident in India in any previous year in every case except where during that year the control and management of its affairs is situated wholly outside India.”

 2. Logical Interpretation

This means:

 Key principle:

A firm is non-resident only if its control and management is wholly outside India.

If even a part of management or decision-making occurs in India, the firm becomes resident.

  3. Meaning of Key Terms

(A) “Control and Management”

  Example:
If business decisions (policy, contracts, investments, financial decisions) are made in India → control in India.

(B) “Wholly Outside India”

  4. Step-by-Step Determination Process

To determine the residential status of a partnership firm for a previous year:

Step 1: Identify where control and management lies.

Step 2: Apply Section 6(2).

Step 3: Confirm consistency annually.

   5. No Sub-classification (Unlike Individuals or HUFs)

      For a partnership firm, there is no further classification like:

It can be only:

CASE STUDY: Residential Status of a Partnership Firm

Case Title:

M/s Sunrise Exports v. The Income Tax Officer

(This is a hypothetical case based on real principles applied in Indian tax rulings.)

      Facts of the Case


    Issue for Determination

What is the residential status of M/s Sunrise Exports for the Previous Year 2024–25 under Section 6(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961?

     Relevant Legal Provisions

      Section 6(2), Income Tax Act, 1961:

A firm or an association of persons (AOP) shall be resident in India, unless the control and management of its affairs is situated wholly outside India during the previous year.

    Therefore:

Meaning of “Control and Management”:

It refers to the place where the key decisions concerning the management and business policies of the firm are made.

It is not the place where day-to-day operations are carried out, but where the central control and management actually lies.

Step-by-Step Analysis

Step 1: Identify where the control and management lies

We must examine who takes the key management and commercial decisions and where they are taken.

Aspect Details Decision Location
Registration & statutory office Mumbai, India India
Books of account Maintained in Mumbai India
Signing of export contracts Done in Dubai Outside India
Key business policy decisions Taken jointly in Dubai Outside India
Day-to-day operations (production, shipping, staff) Controlled by Indian staff under Arjun India

Step 2: Determine if management is wholly outside India

  • Business is partly managed from India (daily operations, accounting, compliance, office).

  • Strategic decisions are taken outside India (Dubai).

Hence, management is partly in India and partly outside India.

  Step 3: Apply Section 6(2)

Since control and management is partly in India, the firm cannot be considered wholly managed from outside India.

Therefore, according to Section 6(2):

The firm shall be Resident in India for the relevant previous year.

Step 4: Implications of Being a Resident Firm

As a Resident firm, M/s Sunrise Exports will be:

  • Taxable in  India on its  income from all over the world, i.e., income earned both in India and outside India.

  • Required to file Indian income tax returns and report foreign income and assets.

  • Eligible to claim foreign tax credit (FTC) under Section 90/91, if taxes are paid in foreign countries (e.g., UAE, UK).


  Step 5: Compare with Alternative Scenario

Suppose the firm had:

  • No Indian office,

  • Books of account and records maintained only in Dubai, and

  • All business decisions and contracts made abroad,

then the control and management would be wholly outside India, and the firm would be Non-Resident.

In that case:

  • Only income accruing or arising in India would be taxable in India.

  • Foreign income would be exempt from Indian taxation.

    Judicial Principle Reference

    Case Reference:
    👉 Radha Rani Holdings (P) Ltd. v. CIT (2012) and Nandlal Girdharilal v. CIT (1954) 26 ITR 21 (SC)
    It was held that “control and management” means de facto control (actual decision-making), not merely legal or nominal control.

    Even if a firm is registered in India, if all management decisions are taken outside India, it can be non-resident.
    But in our case, management is partly in India — thus Resident.

    Final Conclusion (Solution)

    Factor Observation
    Legal control Mumbai (India)
    Business control Partly in India (operations), partly outside India (strategic)
    Accounting & compliance India
    Hence, control wholly outside India? No
    Residential Status Resident in India (u/s 6(2))

    Therefore, M/s Sunrise Exports is a Resident Partnership Firm in India for Assessment Year 2025–26.
    It is liable to pay tax in India on its income from all over the world.

    Key Learning from the Case

    Lesson Explanation
    “Control and management” decides residency Not the place of registration or partners’ residence
    Even partial management in India → Resident The phrase “wholly outside India” is strict
    Resident firm taxed on global income Non-resident firm taxed only on Indian income
    Judicial test → “Central control test” Where are the key management decisions made?
Exit mobile version